Home Blog Page 1564

21 IPS officers empanelled for Joint Secretary at Centre

0


The Narendra Modi goverment on tuesday has approved the empanelment of 21 IPS officers, belonging to 1987, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1994 and 1995 batch,for appointment to the posts of Joint Secretary or equivalent at the Centre.

IPS officers empanelled to hold Joint Secretary level post are :

1. M.R Aruna (IPS:1987:MP)
2. Sunil Kumar Bansal (IPS:1987:OR)
3. B.K. Upadhyay (IPS:1989:MH)
4. Sadanand Vasant Date (IPS:1990:MH)
5. Debasis Panigrahi (IPS:1991:OR)
6. Kasireddy V.R.N Reddy (IPS:1992:AP)
7. Garima Bhatnagar (IPS:1994:AGMUT)
8. Amardeep Singh Rai (IPS:1994:PB)
9. Vinit Dev Wankhede (IPS:1994:TN)
10. Kumar Vishwajeet (IPS:1994:AP)
11. Amrendra Kumar Senger (IPS:1995:UP)
12. M.R. Ajith Kumar (IPS:1995:KL)
13. Ravi Joseph Lokku (IPS:1995:UP)
14. Pradeep Gupta (IPS:1995:CG)
15. R. Malarvizhi (IPS:1995:BH)
16. David Lalrinsanga (IPS:1995:UT)
1&. Gollapalli Nageswara Rao (IPS:1995:PB)
18. Sandeep Mittal (IPS:1995:TN)
19. Yogesh Deshmukh (IPS:1995:MP)
20. Padmakar S Ranipse (IPS:1995:OR)
21. Vijay Bhatia (IPS:1995:UP)

IAS marriages are made in Mussoorie, record six 2016 batch IAS couples get married

0


This is a unique record created by the 2016 batch of 156 IAS officers. There are six married couple among them. There are also cases an officer marrying an officer from junior batch, while another officer marrying officer from the senior batch.

These couple got married while training at the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration in Mussoorie. The date from the Department of Personnel and Training reveal that as many as 52 IAS officers from various batches got married to a fellow officer since 2017.

However, such marital bliss become headache to the government, as it has to redo the elaborate exercise of allocating cadres to these IAS couples. Government has to allocate cadre in such a way that a couple works in the same state.

CBI Chargesheet to hit officer’s morale: Bureaucrats

0


Top serving and retired bureaucrats reacted to the the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filling charge sheet against former bureaucrats, saying it would lower the morale of the bureaucracy and severely affect decision making process in the country.

The CBI has named 18 accused in the Aircel-Maxis case that includes former Finance

Minister P Chidambaram, his son Karti, former economic affairs secretary Ashok Kumar Jha, Ashok Chawla, then Additional Secretary of the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) and now chairman of the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and two serving officers from Indian Administrative Service (IAS) cadre.

Serving and retired bureaucrats are of the view that often officers are framed in such conspiracies and made guinea pigs in the political fights. They say, all files go through them and in defence of what they write that favours a particular case, they become a part of the case whether guilty or not. However, the IAS association prefers to remain quiet on the latest CBI charge-sheet. A senior bureaucrat opined that the amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act were pending in Parliament for six years now, which provide the much-needed protection to a retired government servant that would offer a layer of protection in case of bonafide policy decisions being treated as criminality by agencies.

CBI, in its chargesheet, alleged that then finance minister P Chidambaram had power to approve foreign investments only up to Rs 600 crore but he cleared Rs 3200-crore investment without referring the matter to Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA).

Will meals at cheaper rates solve the problem of hunger in the country?

0

Nearly a year after the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NMC) launched its first Rs 10 per thali kiosks in north Delhi on a pilot basis, it now plans to develop 500 more such kiosks across parts of the city that come under their jurisdiction. Nothing would bring more cheers to the poor people of Delhi than this that they would get meals at cheap rate very easily.  A similar project was undertaken by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation as well and it is expected that it will be implemented in other municipal zones of Delhi also. Whenever such initiative is undertaken, it is perceived as a populist measure having political undertones and more so when 2019 elections are not far away.

However, Delhi’s cheap meal scheme is not a first of its kind. The NMC’s thali project, is just an extension of the Jan Aahar scheme launched by former CM Sheila Dikshit. The pilot thali project, meanwhile, was launched on December 25 (former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s birthday) last year under the Centre’s Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Antyodaya Yojana. By December 2018, NDMC believes that these 500 kiosks would serve the poor across 104 municipal wards.

For a place like Delhi, the scheme to provide cheap meal is just the need of the hour. Not only significant number of people in Delhi are below the poverty line, many migrant daily wage workers come from far flung areas of the country in search of work but do not have the capacity to buy meal for themselves from the restaurant.

The scheme of providing meal at a cheap rate is not something that is known only to Delhi. It has been launched in many parts of the country and is successfully running. To be fair, the scheme first had its beginning in Tamil Nadu in 2013. The state’s former Chief Minister Jayalalitha’s scheme of starting Amma Canteen where poor people are served sambhar and rice only for Rs 5 was had become talk of the country. Amma Canteen still serves food to more than 3.5 lakh poor people daily at the lowest possible cost and is a major contributor to the overall cost of living in the city.

The success of Tamil Nadu’s Amma canteen led its neighbouring state Andhra Pradesh to replicate the scheme and implement its ‘Annapurna Scheme’.

Odisha’s ‘Ahar Yojana’ is also similar to these schemes under which cheap lunch are provided to the urban poor at five rupees. It was inaugurated on April 1, 2015 by the Chief Minister of Odisha Navin Patnaik on Utkal Divas. The scheme has been applauded at various forums.

Rajasthan also has a scheme that provides breakfast for Rs 5 and lunch and dinner for Rs 8.

A similar scheme has been launched in Uttarakhand. Uttar Pradesh too is trying to emulate the successful ‘Amma canteen’ model of Tamil Nadu to provide heavily subsidised nutritious breakfast, lunch and dinner to the economically weak people.

These scheme on the one hand provides a cheaper and a good option to poor people to fill their stomach and on the other, it provides a support to migrant labourers and workers making them food available within their means to sustain themselves.

But, the success of such schemes will be ensured only when there is no compromise on the quality of food that is served and most importantly that it does not get embroiled in the bureaucratic red tapism and corruption.

It is encouraging that the scheme that started in south India is gaining acceptance and being widely replicated in north India too. It is a litmus test for these states as to how well it can manage the scheme.

There are many charitable and religious institutions in the country that provide food to the needy and poor, but they can do so to only limited extent and to limited number of people. But, if we see the other side, this situation should not arise at all. It is the government who should shoulder the responsibility to ensure to provide cheap meal to the needy and poor.  But, any such scheme should only be a temporary arrangement. The endeavour should be take our economy to a level where each and every citizen of the country could procure food for himself.

SC red cards Lynchistan, says ‘Mobocracy can’t be the new norm’. Will govt frame law on lynching?

0

Amid a rise in number of mob lynching cases across India, the Supreme Court today said,”Horrendous acts of mobocracy cannot be allowed to become a new norm and has to be curbed with iron hands.” The apex court’s order came on a batch of petitions, including one by social activist Tehseen S Poonawalla and Tushar Gandhi, seeking to curb violence by cow vigilante groups. Gandhi had also filed a contempt plea on some states, accusing them of not enforcing the earlier orders of the court. The apex court order is pertaining not only to cow vigilante violence but also regarding violence perpetrated by all vigilante groups.

29 deaths in 3 months
Across India, lynching has claimed 29 deaths in a just couple of months, and since May last year, the mob violence has claimed 36 lives.

TIMELINE OF THE INCIDENTS

2017

  • May 18: 3 persons killed in Nagadih village in Jharkhand
  • May 19: 4 persons lynched in Shobhapur village in Jharkhand

2018

  • 9 May: 2 killed in Tamil Nadu.
  • 23 May: Man lynched in Bengaluru.
  • May 2018: 6 killed in Andhra and Telangana in separate incidents
  • 8 June: 2 lynched to death in Assam.
  • 11 June: 1 killed in Goregaon town, Maharashtra
  • 8 June: 2 lynched in Aurangabad, Maharashtra
  • 13 June: Man lynched to death in Malta, West Bengal
  • 15 June: Two men from Ujjain in M.P were attacked by a crowd outside a dargah in the Chawani area of Aurangabad. One succumbed
  • 22 June: An unidentified man, who police say was “mentally challenged”, was lynched by a mob of 15 after he failed to establish his innocence, in Surguja, Chhattisgarh
  • 23 June: Man lynched to death in East Midnapore, West Bengal.
  • 26 June: 45-year-old beggar woman killed in Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
  • 28 June: 3 lynched to death in Tripura in a single day, including a man hired by the government to go around dispelling rumours.
  • 1 July: 5 lynched in Maharashtra’s Dhule district.
  • 13 July: Techie lynched to death in Bidar, Karnataka
  • 20 July: Rakbar Khan attacked and beaten to death by mob vigilantes in Alwar, Rajasthan

On July 3 also the court had taken a serious note of lynchings and mob violence, and had put the onus on the states to check such incidents, saying “Incidents of cow vigilantism were unacceptable, and it was up to the states to prevent them”. It also said, “The Centre should frame a scheme under Article 257 (Control of the Union over States in certain cases) of Constitution.” On September 6 last year, the apex court had asked all the states to take stern measures to stop violence in the name of cow protection, including appointing senior police officers as nodal officers in every district within a week and acting promptly to check cow vigilantes from behaving like they are a “law unto themselves”. The question then arises, is Narendra Modi government really serious about stopping lynching and what has the government done so far?

Last year, MoS for home affairs Hansraj Ahir had told Rajya Sabha (19 July, 2017), “I don’t think there is a need to bring changes in the law. The state governments could take action against persons involved in such incidents under existing laws.”

Currently, there is no specific law against lynching. Mob lynching cases are recorded as a case of rioting under IPC section 147 and as murder under IPC Sec 300. There is no section in the Indian Penal Code specifically for lynching.

From suspicions of cow slaughter to beef consumption and now “child lifters”, India has become synonymous with lynchland. What is encouraging people to take law into their hands? Hasn’t Gau Raksha lynching emboldened mobs?

According to June 2017 IndiaSpend Report, there was a Rise in lynching and attacks on Muslims by Gau Rakshaks after Modi govt came to power. In July last year, Centred had told the Supreme Court that the government does not support any kind of vigilantism in any state. But according to IndiaSpend Data:

“Muslims were the target of 51% of violence centred on bovine issues over nearly eight years (2010 to 2017) and comprised 86% of 28 Indians killed in 63 incidents. And, as many of 97 % of these attacks were reported after PM Narendra Modi’s government came to power in May 2014.” Clearly, tThe facts are there to speak for itself.

The Centre brushing its hands off also told the top court that “Law and order is a state subject and Central government does not have any role in it.” But the research data says (India Spend). According to the report, Out of 97 % of the attacks that were reported after PM Narendra Modi’s government came to power, about half the cow-related violence–32 of 63 cases–were from states governed by the BJP when the attacks were reported. And these attacks – sometimes collectively referred to as gautankwad, for cow and terrorism, on social media – were reported from 19 of 29 Indian states, with Uttar Pradesh (10), Haryana (9), Gujarat (6), Karnataka (6), Madhya Pradesh (4), Delhi (4) and Rajasthan (4) reporting the highest number of cases.

On July 3 when the Supreme Court was hearing the petition, advocate Indira Jaising had said the violent incidents of cow vigilantism “go beyond crime and law and order problems” and “there is a pattern to it”. But the bench headed by CJI Dipak Misra said, “It would “not confine these incidents to any particular motive”…“this is mob violence, which is a crime”….. We want to protect victims.” This came on the face of Congress that has been alleged Modi government of encouraging lynching.

No public outcry on lynching

Last year, the cases of 16-year old Junaid Khan who was lynched in a train in Ballabgarh, Haryana and one in Jharkand allegedly for carrying beef had led to protests like #NotInMyName across the country. But that does not seem to have woken up the government from its slumber.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi had also condemned mob attacks on cattle traders, beef eaters and dairy farmers, saying killing people in the name of protecting cows is unacceptable. He said, “Killing people in the name of Gau Bhakti is not acceptable. No person in this nation has the right to take the law in his or her own hands in this country”. He even invoked Mahatama Gandhi by saying “This is not something Mahatma Gandhi would approve”. But that proved only a tokenism.

Law on Lynching

India has witnessed a spate of medieval-style lynchings in the last two years: from Mohammad Akhlaq’s murder in Dadri in 2015 to Pehlu Khan’s lynching in Rajasthan last month; from the 2015 Dimapur lynching where a rape suspect was killed by a mob in Nagaland, to two men being lynched on suspicions of being “cattle theives” in Assam. Murder and mob justice as a public spectacle has become the norm for the underrepresented and socially-backward communities.

Now, the Supreme Court has asked the legislature to consider enacting a new penal provision to deal with offences of mob violence and provide deterrent punishment to such offenders. It also gave slew of directions, including preventive, remedial and punitive steps to deal with the crime.

The entire concept of governance and rule of law rests on the state having exclusive rights to act and control violence. But in mob justice the non-state actors appropriate the right to do violence.
People involved in lynching have no regards for formal institutions. Senior Advocate Indira Jaising has asserted that “lynching of Muslim in India have become a badge of honour for the perpetrators”.

It is high time that India has a muscular law on lynching to stop this inhumanity.

Recently, Nigeria drafted an anti-lynching law. Some countries have tried to curb lynching by controlling fake news. Malaysia has framed such a law and only in April this year a man became the first person to be convicted for posting fake video on YouTube. An anti-lynching bill was introduced in the US Senate last month. Then what stops India from having a law on lynching?

Temple entry of women is a fundamental right, will Sabarimala verdict be replicated throughout the country?

0

Recently, when the Supreme Court said that women have the fundamental rights to enter Sabiramala temple, it sent across the hopes to billions of women in the country that like men, they too have inalienable right to enter temple and worship the God. The apex court had observed that banning the entry of women in Sabarimala temple is unconstitutional and questioning the rationale behind banning the entry of women in the 10-50 age group, it said menstruation may begin before the age of 10 and menopause may hit women much earlier.

The Ayyappa temple in Sabarimala, Kerala, prohibits women of menstruating age (between ten and 50 years of age) from entering it – a prohibition enforced under Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules, 1965: “Women who are not by custom and usage allowed to enter a place of public worship shall not be entitled to enter or offer worship in any place of public worship.”

Our constitution does not permit discrimination on the basis of caste, religion, language and sex. But, the social reality is widely different from what the constitution ideally wants the country to be. Thhe discrimination not only occurs at the individual level or at the level of the family, but also at the organisational level. Kerala’s famous Sabarimala is the best example of the latter where women in the age group of 10-50 have been denied temple entry. For decades there have been demands to remove the restrictions based on age-old stereotypes and patriarchal thoughts. The apex court has taken a strong exception to the reason for denying women’s entry into Sabarimala. It said when men can enter the temple, women too cannot be denied the same, stating that it is their constitutional right to enter the temple.

Depriving a person any opportunity on the basis of sex is unconstitutional. The recent court’s ruling is a reminder to his fact. But, despite the constitutional safeguards, women have been denied entry into Sabarimala temple for decades. There are basically two reason for it. Firstly, the giving religious sanctity to traditional beliefs about religious rites and rituals. Secondly, our constitution also talks about religious autonomy. But with time the traditional rules began to be challenged and the demand for women’s entry into Sabarimala temple intensified. As a result, in 2015, the state government supported the demand for entry of women in the Sabarimala temple, but in 2017 the government opposed the same demand. Considering the Sabarimala issue as very important matter, last year the Supreme Court referred it to five judge constitutional bench. There were two other similar issues- one of Shani Singnapur temple and the other of Dargah Ali. Women were denied entry into these religious places as well.

Earlier, when Bombay High Court was hearing whether women should be allowed entry into religious places, the trust of these religious places contended that it was an age-old tradition and it should not be interfered with. But the court upheld ‘the fundamental rights of women, the right to equality and the right to freedom of worship’. It said no law bars entry of women in the places of worship, and hence no gender discrimination in this regard should be tolerated. Similarly, the Supreme court upholding the right to equality paved the way for women’s entry first into Shani Shingnapur temple and then into Dargah Ali. And now, Supreme Court has reiterated the same for Sabarimala temple. It should therefore be clear that even if constitution provides autonomy to religious institutions, there is a limit to it. It cannot come in the way of a larger constitutional safeguard, i.e the right to equality. The difference between these two rights should always be kept in mind so that rites and rituals based on the traditions should not neglect the social equality and the rights of the citizens.

3 IAS officers transferred in Haryana

0


Haryana goverment has issued transfer and posting orders of three IAS officers on friday.

1. Vivek Joshi (IAS:1989:HY), Principal Secretary, Monitoring and Coordination Department has been given additional charge as, Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala, Chief Administrator, Trade Fair Authority of Haryana Institute for Fiscal Management and Principal Resident Commissioner, Haryana Bhawan, New Delhi has been given additional Charge of Designated CEO, Kundli Manesar Palwal Authority, relieving T.L.Satyaprakash.

2. Nikhil Gajraj (IAS:2008:HY), Adminitrator, Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran, Faridabad has been trasferred and posted as Director, Consolidation of Land Holdings and Land Records,Special Officer (Headquarters) and Special LAO and Special Secretary, Revenue & Disaster Management Department.

3. Nishant Kumar Yadav (IAS:2013:HY) Secretary, Haryana Public Service Commission has been posted as Additional Deputy Commissioner-cum-CEO,DRDA, Karnal and Secretary, RTA, Karnal. He will also be Secretary, HPSC in addition.

Over 2,400 IAS, IPS posts vacant: Govt

0


Over 2,400 posts of IAS and IPS officers are lying vacant in the country. Yes, you read it right. Thousands of candidates take the UPSC exam every year to get into IAS and IPS, but very few are successful. Despite the huge interest, you will be surprised to know that as many as 2,400 IAS and IPS posts are currently vacant.

As many as 1,449 Indian Administrative Service (IAS) posts or 22.11 per cent of the sanctioned strength of 6,553 are vacant. There are 970 vacancies in the Indian Police Service (IPS) or 19.64 per cent of the total 4,940 posts. Revealing this information on Friday, Union Minister of State for Personnel Jitendra Singh, in a written reply to the Rajya Sabha, said there are over 2,400 posts of IAS (Indian Administrative Services) and IPS (Indian Police Services) officers vacant in the country.

On the question over when these posts would be filled, Union Minister of State for Personnel Jitendra Singh says the occurrence of vacancies and its filling up is an ongoing process.

Every year the UPSC (Union Public Service Commission), conducts written exams and interviews for various vacant posts of IAS, IFS, IRS and others. Under the exam, aspiring candidates have to clear three levels — preliminary, mains and personality test or interview — to become eligible for these top-level administrative services.

COLLEGIUM RECOMMENDATION HIT A ROADBLOCK, CENTRE REJECTS NAME FOR DELHI HC CJ

0


The Central government has returned the name of Justice Aniruddha Bose whose name was recommended by the Collegium for elevation as Chief Justice of Delhi High Court. After keeping the file pending for over five months, the government told the collegium to reconsider its decision.

The reason given by the Centre for rejecting the collegium recommendation is that the 59 year old Justice Bose, a judge in calcutta high court, does not command any experience as a Chief Justice to head a prominent High Court like Delhi.

The Supreme Court Collegium had recommended Bose J. for elevation to Delhi High Court on January 10. Besides Bose, the Collegium had on the same day recommended appointment of Chief Justices to nine other High courts.

While eight of those appointments have gone through, the candidature of Justice Bose and Justice Surya Kant have hit a roadblock. Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court has been functioning with an acting Chief Justice for more than a year now. Justice Gita Mittal has been at the helm of Delhi High Court since April 14, 2017.

The government had recently stalled the elevation of Uttarakhand High Court Chief Justice KM Joseph to the Supreme Court citing seniority and regional representation.

75 IPS officers transferred in Rajasthan

0


Rajasthan government has transferred and redesignated 75 IPS officers on thursday.

The names of the officers and their postings are as follows :

1. N Ravindra Kumar Reddy : Special DG, Law and Order.
2. Dr. Alok Tripathi : DG, Anti-Corruption Bureau.
3. Dr. Bhupendra Singh : DG, Jail.
4. Smita Shrivatava : IG, Armed Battalion-II, Jaipur.
5. Prafull Kumar : DIG, Anti-Terrorism, ATS.
6. Dr. Nitin Deep Blaggan : Addtional Police Commissioner, Jaipur
7. U.L Chhanwal : DIG, Training.
8. Snajay Kumar Kshotriya : DIG,CB.
9. Surendra Kumar Gupta : DIG, Anti Corruption Bureau.
10. Dilip Kumar : DIG, RPTC, Jodhpur.
11. Lalit Maheshwari : DIG, Jail, Jodhpur.
12. Ravi Datt Gaud : DIG, Armed Btt-1 PHQ, Jaipur.
13. Laxman Gaud : DIG, Crime Branch.
14. Prasann Kumar Khamesara : DIG, Personnel.
15. Gaurav Shrivastava : Additional Police Commissioner, Jaipur.
16. Sharat Kaviraj : DIG, SCRB, Jaipur.
17. C Santosh Kumar Tukaram : DIG, SSB.
18. Mrs S Parimala : DIG, Security-II, Jaipur.
19. Vikas Kumar : DIG, Home Security, Jaipur.
20. Deepak Kumar : DIG, CM Security.
21. Ajay Pal Lamba : SP, Jaipur rural.
22. Dr. Vishnu Kant : Commandant 1st RAC, Jodhpur.
23. Mrs Param Jyoti : Director, Intelligence Training Academy, Jaipur.
24. Rajendra Singh : SP, Alwar.
25. Jainarayan : SP, ACB, Jaipur.
26. Sandeep Singh Chauhan : SP, CID, Civil Rigthts, Jaipur.
27. Anshuman Bhomia : SP, CID-CB, Jaipur
28. Rahul Prakash : SP, Pali.
29. Anil Kumar Tank : Principal, PTS, Kishangarh, Ajmer.
30. Mamta Rahul : Commandant, State Disaster Response Force.
31. Barhat Rahul Manhardan : Deputy Police Commissioner, Jaipur East.
32. Randhir Singh : SP, Crime Branch, Jaipur.
33. Harendra Kumar Mahawar : SP, Nagaur.
34. Dr. Vikas Pathak : Deputy Police Commissioner, Jaipur City (South)
35. Om Prakash-II : SP, Bundi.
36. Sameer Kumar Singh : SP, Sawaimadhopur.
37. Tejraj Singh Kharodia : SP, ACB, Bikaner.
38. Rajesh Singh : SP, Ajmer.
39. Jagdish Chandra Sharma : SP, Jaisalmer.
40. Rajendra Prasad Goyal : SP, Crime Branch, Jaipur.
41. Sweta Dhankhad : Commandant, Hadi Rani Bt, Ajmer.
42. Ajay Singh : SP, Karauli.
43. Yogesh Yadav : SP, Sriganganagar.
44. Kunwar Rashtradeep : SP, Udaipur.
45. Kalyan Mal Meena : SP, CID, Commissioner, PHQ, Traffic, Jodhpur.
46. Anil Kumar-II : SP, Hanumangarh.
47. Pradeep Mohan Sharma : Deputy Commissioner, PHQ, Traffic, Jodhpur.
48. Deepak Bhargava : SP, Kota city.
49. Sunil Kumar Vishnoi : SP, Baran.
50.Manish Agarwal-II : SP,ATS.
51. Dusht Daman Singh : SP, Dhaulpur.
52. Dr. Rameshwar Singh : SP, Bhilwara.
53. Himmat Abhilash Tak : SP, CID,Intelligence, Jaipur.
54. Dr. Gagandeep Singla : Deputy Police Commossioner, PHQ, Jaipur.
55. Deshmukh Paris Anil : SP, Jhunjhunu.
56. Rathod Vinit Kumar Trikamalan : Deputy Commissioner, Crime, Jaipur.
57. Yadram Fansal : DIG, Jail, Jaipur.
58. Manoj Kumar : SP, Chittorgarh.
59. Maman Singh Yadav : Deputy Police Commissioner, Jaipur Metro Rail Corporation, Jaipur.
60. Bhuwan Bhusan Yadav : SP, Rajsamand.
61. Gaurav Yadav : SP, Sikar.
62. Puja Awana : Commandant, 8th Bt RAC, New Delhi.
63. Jai Yadav : SP, Sirohi.
64. Tejswani Gautam : SP, ACB, Jodhpur.
65. Anil Kumar : Commandant,7th Bt RAC, Bharatpur.
66. Dharmendra Singh : ADC, Governor.
67. Mudul Kachchava : Circle officer, Sriganganagar.
68. Deepak Yadav : Asst Police Commissioner, Amer, Jaipur.
69. Rajendra Kumar : SP, Traffic, PHQ, Jaipur.
70. Prahlad Singh Kishniya : Commandant, 3rd Bt RAC, Bikaner.
71. Sharad Chaudhary : SP, Badmer.
72. Raj Kumar Gupta : SP, SSB, Jaipur.
73. Keshar Sing Shekhawat : SP, Bharatpur.
74. Ram Murty Joshi : SP, Churu.
75. Monika Sen : Police Commissioner (West), Jodhpur City.

Latest Posts

WhatsApp Icon Join Us on WhatsApp