UPSC clarifies names of real successful candidates, says its system is robust and fool-proof

The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) Friday said it is contemplating criminal and disciplinary action against two candidates who allegedly claimed their selection in the civil services examination 2022, whose result was declared Tuesday.

0

The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) Friday said it is contemplating criminal and disciplinary action against two candidates who allegedly claimed their selection in the civil services examination 2022, whose result was declared Tuesday.

On Friday, UPSC issued a statement, clarifying that the candidates Aysha Makrani (from Madhya Pradesh) and Tushar (from Haryana) falsely claimed to have been selected in the exam. “The claims of both persons are fake. They have forged the documents in their favour to buttress their claims,” the statement read.

Also Read: Tushar Vs Tushar: Two candidates with same name, roll number claim 44th UPSC rank

UPSC confirmed that Tushar Kumar and Ayesha Fatima had secured 44th rank and 184 rank respectively in the final CSE, 2022 result. It further said that its examination system is robust and fool-proof and such errors are not possible.

As per the statement, Aysha Makrani, daughter of Salimmuddin Makrani, had forged her documents. She appeared in the preliminary examination held in June last year, where she failed to qualify in one paper and scored far fewer marks than the cut-off marks in another. The commission noted that since she failed the preliminary stage itself, her claim of securing 184th rank in the final result stood false. It also clarified that Ayasha Fatima, daughter of Naziruddin is the genuine candidate.

Also Read: Two MP girls claim same rank in Civil Services Exam-2022

In another case of Tushar Kumar, one from Haryana’s Rewari and the other from Bhagalpur, Bihar, the commission clarified that the candidate hailing from Bihar is genuine and has secured the 44th rank. The other candidate from Haryana had also failed to clear the preliminary stage of the exam held in June 2022. He scored negative marks on one paper, and less than cut off in another.

The statement further said that both candidates violated the provisions of the rules governing the civil services exam, therefore commission is contemplating both criminal as well as disciplinary penal action against both candidates for their fraudulent acts.