Uttarakhand HC notices to centre, state govt over irregularities in appointment of SSC member

0

The Centre, Uttarakhand government, and Postal Department were issued notices by a division bench of Uttarakhand High Court in connection with the irregularities conducted in the appointment of Member in Staff Selection Commission. The notice was issued on the petition of IFS Officer Sanjiv Chaturvedi (IFS:2002:UK).

The story that sparked the issue goes like this..Chaturvedi had applied for the post of Member in Staff Selection Commission in March 2020 on the basis of an open advertisement issued by the Central Government in January 2020.

However, as per the petition, the candidature of Chaturvedi was declined by the selection committee on the ground that his application had reached late, that is on May 29, 2021, while the last date was March 23, 2020.

Not limiting themselves to the fudging of Chaturvedi’s DOB, unknown officials also tampered with the date of receiving his application for the post well past the timeline.

However, the speed post tracking report enclosed with the petition shows that the Uttarakhand government had forwarded the name of Sanjiv Chaturvedi for the said post on March 19, 2020, which was received in the
office of the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) on March 20, 2020.

Also, the date of birth of Chaturvedi was shown to be August 4, 1962, while his actual date of birth is December 21, 1974. This was apparently done to disqualify him from consideration for the post of member of the Staff Selection Commission.

Further, the selection committee declined to accept Chaturvedi’s post-graduate diploma from Indira Gandhi National Forest Academy, Dehradun, as a post-graduate degree. While the gazette notification issued by the central government in April 1998 clearly declares that an ‘IGNFA’ Diploma to be treated equivalent to MSc (Forestry)’.

The petition shows that Ashok Kumar, a 1991 batch officer of Indian Railway Personnel Service (IRPS), who was finally selected for this post, has not even completed the mandatory cooling-off period of three years. As per the appointment order issued in September 2020, this mandatory cooling-off period requirement was relaxed in his case by DoPT.

The petition also mentions the instructions issued by the DoPT in the year 2013, where it was clearly mentioned that names of only those officers have to be forwarded for deputation who have completed mandatory cooling-off period, and in exceptional cases where this requirement is to be relaxed, detailed justification has to be sent and prior concurrence of DoPT has to be sought, which was not done in this case.

The appointment committee in its meeting held on July 10, 2020, had shortlisted five candidates for interview and finally, the name of Ashok Kumar was approved by the committee of the Cabinet headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The petition points out that the ACC in its meeting held on July 10, 2020, had shortlisted five candidates for interview and finally approved the name of Ashok Kumar.

WhatsApp Group Join Now
Telegram Group Join Now